Partnerships are becoming a very effective way to build the Energy transformation. There are a awful lot of challenges in the energy sector where the complexity becomes to much for one player and they need to partner. There is actually a significant interplay between technological, regulatory and market-driven challenges

Lets just take a look at six of the most significant issues that require Partner Ecosystem thinking and design.

Partner ecosystems in the energy sector face a complex interplay of technological, regulatory, and market-driven challenges.

Here are six of the most significant issues:

1. Interoperability and Standardization

• Challenge: A plethora of systems, protocols, and data formats hinders seamless integration and data exchange between partners.
• Possible Partner Ecosystem Solutions: Promoting open standards, APIs, and data sharing platforms can foster interoperability.

2. Data Security and Privacy

• Challenge: Handling sensitive customer and operational data requires robust security measures while complying with regulations.
• Possible Partner Ecosystem Solutions: Implementing advanced cybersecurity protocols, data encryption, and privacy frameworks are essential.

3. Scalability and Agility

• Challenge: Rapidly changing market dynamics and technological advancements demand flexible and scalable ecosystems.
• Possible Partner Ecosystem Solutions: Building modular and adaptable platforms, fostering innovation, and enabling rapid prototyping can address this.

4. Trust and Collaboration

• Challenge: Establishing trust and effective collaboration among diverse partners with competing interests is crucial.
• Possible Partner Ecosystem Solutions: Transparent communication, shared value propositions, and incentive alignment can foster trust.

5. Regulatory Compliance

• Challenge: Navigating a complex regulatory landscape, both at national and international levels, can be burdensome.
• Possible Partner Ecosystem Solutions: Staying updated on regulations, leveraging regulatory sandboxes, and building compliance into ecosystem design are essential.

6. Customer Experience

• Challenge: Delivering a seamless and personalized customer experience across multiple touch points and partners is challenging.
• Possible Partner Ecosystem Solutions: Focusing on customer-centric design, data-driven insights, and integrated service offerings can enhance customer experience.

By addressing these challenges across the energy sector through the concept of partner ecosystems in thinking and design can unlock new opportunities, improve efficiency, and create value for all stakeholders.

So many of the Energy issues are interconnected. There is a rich interplay that has real value

I would argue by initially considering these broader categories there emerges perhaps far more effective, and collective, strategies to address then.

Building on the Foundation– Building different categories to recognize the connected dynamics

Interconnected Categories where Partner Ecosystems can help– for instance:

1. Market and Regulatory Challenges

• Policy and Regulation: Covers issues related to government policies, regulations, and incentives that impact the energy sector, such as feed-in tariffs, carbon pricing, and grid codes.
• Market Structure: Encompasses challenges related to market design, competition, and consumer behavior, including issues like energy market liberalization, retail competition, and consumer engagement.
• Financial Viability: Addresses economic factors affecting the energy sector, such as investment, financing, and risk management.

2. Technological Challenges

• Innovation and R&D: Focuses on the development and commercialization of new technologies, such as advanced energy storage, renewable energy generation, and digital grid technologies.
• Infrastructure Development: Covers challenges related to building and upgrading energy infrastructure, including grid modernization, charging stations, and hydrogen pipelines.
• Cybersecurity: Addresses the growing threat of cyberattacks on energy systems and the need for robust cybersecurity measures.

3. Social and Environmental Challenges

• Sustainability and Climate Change: Encompasses challenges related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, adapting to climate change, and promoting sustainable energy practices.
• Energy Access and Affordability: Addresses the need to provide reliable and affordable energy to all, including issues of energy poverty and off-grid communities.
• Public Acceptance and Engagement: Focuses on building public support for energy projects and addressing concerns about environmental and social impacts.

Interplay of Categories

It’s important to note that these categories are interconnected and need partnerships to tackle the complexities. For example, the development of new renewable energy technologies (Technological Challenges) is influenced by government policies (Market and Regulatory Challenges) and public acceptance (Social and Environmental Challenges).

Within any partnership dynamics we do need to build trust and collaboration, also the need for balancing competition and cooperation, alignment of business models and have some mutual governance and decision-making mechanisms

By considering these broader categories, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges facing partner ecosystems in the energy sector and develop more effective strategies to address them.

I am focusing increasingly on providing advisor, coaching and mentoring of Partner Ecosystems and without doubt the Energy Sector is in real need of accelerating its points of cooperation, collaboration and co-creation to help with our ongoing Energy transition.

Making the connection

If you are curious to learn more about the benefits, concepts and solutions to consider within Partner Ecosystems then please CONTACT ME through this link and we can have a opening discussion of challenges and perhaps alternative ways to tackle these.

The post The many Partner Ecosystem challenges within the Energy Sector first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

The World Economic Forum Advanced Energy Solutions Group is the catalyst for bringing together outstanding change makers, entrepreneurs, financiers and innovators from across the world and recently had one of its meetings to stimulate and encourage this initiative further. Why?

There are enormous opportunities in the clean energy transition but also so many current barriers and pitfalls.

Taking the WEF’s objectives with this group I quote from their website:

“The World Economic Forum’s Advanced Energy Solutions community aims to accelerate, from decades to years, the deployment at industrial scale of advanced solutions such as clean fuels and hydrogen, advanced nuclear, storage and carbon removal. It engages leaders in frontier segments of the energy system that drive the energy transition”.

The community helps build confidence in advanced energy solutions, provides a platform to engage leading innovators with large energy producers, energy consumers and investors, and addresses regulation and policy.

The WEF offers a wide range of communities to build a better future enabled by sustainable, inclusive, and resilient industry ecosystems.

WEF lays out a vision for this Advanced Energy Solution Group

This document proposes a vision for the advanced energy solutions industry and the key factors that will ensure success in achieving the required levels of deployment in the coming years. It aims to enhance understanding and support collaboration within industry and across stakeholder groups, inform decision-making and foster best practice-sharing.

The vision was shaped by the World Economic Forum, supported by L.E.K. Consulting, through meetings of the Advanced Energy Solutions CEO community, interviews with senior executives and in-depth research and analysis.

This group focuses on the central role of energy storage, carbon management, small modular reactors, clean hydrogen and sustainable aviation fuels in the global endeavour to reduce carbon emissions and achieve a net-zero future. These may be deemed as advanced but for me, they are critical.

The challenge is well laid out.

The net-zero emissions path in 2030 will need carbon capture and storage (CCS) to scale to 20 times the current capacity, energy storage to 35 times, clean hydrogen production 70 times and sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) 190 times. Additionally, mass deployment of new advanced nuclear reactors will be needed.

Such unprecedented capacity growth will need investment, which must grow to more than $500
billion per year by 2030. However, while progress is being made, it is significantly lagging. Publicly announced plans currently cover only a fraction of the estimated investment needs. The deployment of these advanced energy solutions needs increased speed and scale.

To quote from this vision document

This is not so much a technology readiness challenge, although that is demanding enough as technology development needs to continue to drive down cost curves and bring new innovations to market.

The WEF see the primary challenge in deploying advanced energy solutions over the next decade does not lie in their technological feasibility. Rather, it lies in confidence in these solutions. Many stakeholders recognize the need for these solutions and the opportunities they offer but are not confident enough to move at the speed and scale required.

The challenge can be broken down into technological confidence, demand confidence, business case confidence and public confidence. In essence, large energy companies, energy users, financial institutions, policy-makers and the general public need to be confident that technologies are proven, safe and able to deliver the most affordable path to net-zero emissions by 2030.

If confidence is the real key, it is the conflicting messages that create this uncertain environment.

The vision points to the critical enablers of collaboration, policy and community. It is all about informing and unlocking multiple challenges to scale. Essential to driving scale, are creating the demand signals, unlocking investment, spreading the risk and informing policy-making.

The ability to speed and scale are essential. Do we have a stable environment for growth and innovation, I think not. Are regulations keeping up with the speed of technical advancement or deployment, I think not. Are the solutions capable for specific needs and local challenges, I think not. Do we have a level playing field for innovation, experimentation and adoption, I think not. Do we have a recognized plan for phasing out assets that still have “useful life” but are hindering the move to clean energy, I think not.

Yes, enabling and informing are both key to the energy transition yet we stay “trapped” or hostage to what we know and have in place. To significantly create change does need a very different approach to energy transition thinking and that has not emerged, it is highly fractured.

The higher Ecosystem need

If the WEF are one of the bodies to enact the change we need to think of a higher order as the ones we have all got so caught up in “the weeds” and entanglement catering to multiple pressure groups, they are not enabling and fostering enough this higher-order we need. I shudder when you consider the CoP events each year. Moving the world back to the Charter agreed in Paris, known as the Paris Agreement would peel away much of the entanglements we have weaved into the Energy transition.

We need a fresh Natural Ecosystem approach.

In a biological ecosystem, ( I quote) “organisms function independently in that their behaviour is designed to promote their own survival. At the same time, they are deeply interdependent – their individual survival depends on their mutual interactions and exchanges essential to driving scale, creating the demand signals, unlocking investment, spreading the risk and informing policy-making.” We need a new energy ecosystem approach”

An ecosystem therefore requires both grand diversity and collaboration. What we need is a significant reordering of this for lifting up the Energy Transition into that higher order that is needed to achieve any successful Energy Transformation that enables us in our diversity to have a Climate that we can thrive and not just survive.

***I recommend reading this paper where the quote comes from “What Corporates Can Do to Help an Innovation Ecosystem Thrive – and Why They Should Do It” by Diana Joseph, Susan Windham-bannister and Mikel Mangold.

***To learn more about the ‘How’ of Clean Tech Innovation, listen In to this Edition of ‘Radio Davos‘ Podcast

The post Advanced Energy Solutions first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

By fostering greater collaboration and co-creation within the Energy Industry, it is becoming crucial to consider Ecosystems in design and thinking. Ecosystems designed well are robust for navigating the complex landscape of any Energy transition.

The Energy transition we are all facing has such high levels of complexity and challenge. We are undertaking a radical redesign of our energy systems where renewables based on clean energy, decarbonization or low carbon, new distributed business models and rapidly growing demands for electricity are all compressed into a thirty-year agenda to achieve net zero. Collaboration, cooperation and coordination will be paramount, and this is where Ecosystems and Platform technology will become essential to manage these “multiple” transformations needed.

Here in this post is a structured argument for promoting Business Ecosystem thinking and design for those involved in the Energy System, emphasizing the benefits of sharing IP, knowledge, research, market insights, and general improvement potentials when it comes to considering Ecosystems within the Energy Transitions, where collaborations are growing in importance and need. I outline ten areas of consideration.

There is a significant amount to think through when it comes to setting up and managing within a collaborative Ecosystem, especially in such an industry as the Energy or specific parts of it, be these geographical or sub-sectors (Grids, Hydrogen, Hard-to-Abate, Wind, Solar, Storage, Europe, China etc., etc).

There has been a reasonably protective environment in the Energy sector with limited choices due to the significant investment in assets and infrastructure, long-term financial commitments, managing these over extended times for risk and continuous investment, primarily operating in highly regulated market conditions over many years. The impact of suddenly opening up and understanding the risks and effects this might have on these investments is causing a natural pause in making a radical change, but can we afford this?

The energy transition brings huge uncertainty to all involved in it in areas of technological change, radically different competition and regulatory needs, the management of the different assets being installed, digitalization and community or customer engagement. It is not one way anymore or our way; this transition is very different.

The idea of collaborating across multiple needs will have to determine where and what value this brings to all the parties involved. This is the critical starting point of Ecosystem design. One prime example where collaborations can start to learn together to extend into an Ecosystem in design is the focus on converging technologies and adopting common standards and commonality.

I have recently provided extensive coverage of how Ecosystems often need to be interconnected to achieve a more outstanding design for sustaining and collective prosperity. In the seven-part series on my ecosystem4innovating.com, you can start by reading the summary of this hierarchy of business ecosystem needs. Equally in supporting this series I provided fifteen (I know!) posts on different aspects of Ecosystems to consider on my paul4innovating.com site, one example is breaking down resistence.

The need when considering any Energy Ecosystem thinking and design

1. Holistic Perspective and Transition Planning:
   • Energy transitions involve multifaceted challenges, from technological advancements to policy changes. A business ecosystem approach allows for a holistic understanding of the interconnected elements and their dependencies.
   • Collaborative efforts enable a comprehensive view of the entire value chain, identifying synergies and gaps that individual entities might overlook.
   • The Energy Transition involves diverse components such as renewable energy sources, grid modernization, energy storage, and sustainable technologies. A business ecosystem approach provides for a comprehensive and growing shared understanding of these elements and facilitates integrated planning and exchanges for a seamless transition.

2. Accelerated Innovation in Ecosystems for Sustainable Technologies:
   • Energy industry transitions require rapid innovation to meet sustainability goals and address climate change. Collaborative ecosystems provide a platform for pooling resources, expertise, and technologies.
   • By sharing knowledge and research, participants can collectively accelerate the development and adoption of innovative solutions, reducing duplication of efforts and optimizing resources.
   • Collaboration within the ecosystem can specifically target innovation in renewable energy technologies, energy storage solutions, and smart grid systems. Joint research and development efforts can accelerate the deployment of sustainable technologies crucial for the Energy Transition.

3. Mitigating Risk in Transition Investments:
   • The energy industry is inherently risky, with technological uncertainties, market dynamics, and regulatory changes.
   • By distributing risks across multiple stakeholders, the impact of uncertainties can be minimized, making it more feasible for organizations to invest in transformative projects.
   • Collaborative ecosystems provide a mechanism for risk-sharing, ensuring that the economic burden of uncertainties is distributed among multiple stakeholders, making it more feasible for organizations to invest in transformative projects.

4. Cost Efficiency:
   • Ecosystems promote resource efficiency by avoiding redundant investments in research and development. Shared knowledge and insights can lead to product development and commercialization cost reductions.
   • Coordinated efforts in infrastructure development, such as shared grids or storage facilities, can also lead to cost savings for the entire ecosystem.
   • Sharing insights and data across the Ecosystem provides a diverse range of knowledge and learning to improve efficiencies and seek higher productivity gains.
   • By providing growing insights and expertise encourages fresh investment and capital in understanding the data, benefits and impacts of assessing commercial returns.

5. Collective Influence on Global Energy Policies:
   • The Energy Transition is a global imperative, and collaborative ecosystems provide a unified voice for the industry in engaging with international policymakers. By working together, organizations can contribute to developing global energy policies that support sustainable practices and facilitate the transition on a broader scale.
   • Well-established Ecosystems with a solid leading voice can shape and influence others; recognizing the emerging (best) practices and broader adoption of these approaches will provide growing insights and leading ways to operate in the future.

6. Optimizing Investment in Transition Infrastructure:
   • Shared resources and insights within the ecosystem can help optimize investments in critical infrastructure for the Energy Transition, such as developing shared renewable energy facilities, storage infrastructure, and intelligent grid systems. This collaboration reduces costs and accelerates the deployment of necessary infrastructure.
   • The need is to shape standards for emerging technologies and infrastructure approaches not just on a national but international level for a global scale in emerging proven solutions that meet the multiple agendas of cost, reliability, security, scaling up potential and low carbon.

7. Regulatory Influence, Shared Insights for Regulatory Alignment:
   • Collaborative ecosystems have a stronger collective voice when engaging with policymakers and regulators. This can influence the creation of supportive policies and regulations that foster innovation and sustainable practices.
   • Unified efforts are more likely to shape a favourable regulatory environment for the energy transition, overcoming barriers that individual organizations might face.
   • The regulatory landscape plays a pivotal role in shaping the Energy Transition. Collaborative ecosystems enable industry players to share insights, lobby collectively for supportive policies, and navigate regulatory challenges more effectively, fostering an environment conducive to sustainable energy practices and building stronger Business & Government partnerships.

8. Market Expansion:
   • Ecosystems provide a platform for companies to access new markets and diversify their offerings. Organizations can tap into each other’s customer bases and distribution channels by collaborating.
   • This can lead to increased market penetration for sustainable energy solutions, as well as creating new business models that cater to emerging needs.
   • A focused business ecosystem approach can be leveraged to expand markets specifically for sustainable energy solutions that can leapfrog past stages of necessary investments.
   • Collaboration allows for joint marketing efforts, shared customer bases, and the creation of new business models that cater specifically to the evolving needs of the Energy Transition and the diverse customer and technology needs (on-demand, EV charging, evolving solutions, two-way flows).

9. Stakeholder and Community Trust and Reputation:
   • Open collaboration fosters transparency and builds trust among stakeholders, including customers, investors, and the public. This can enhance the reputation of the entire ecosystem and its diverse participants.
   • A positive reputation is increasingly crucial in attracting investments, partnerships, and customers, especially in industries undergoing significant transitions.
   • Social licence is vital for community engagement and civil voice to have higher inclusion levels in policy framing, implementation, mutual obligation, and association.

10. Building a Long-Term Resilient Energy Ecosystem:
    • The Energy Transition introduces new challenges, including intermittency in renewable energy sources, building resilience and response differently and, for example, the need for advanced energy storage solutions.
    • A collaborative ecosystem builds resilience by fostering joint efforts against external shocks and unforeseen challenges by creating a support network. Entities within the ecosystem can adapt more effectively to emerging challenges, ensuring the sustainability of the energy transition over the long term.

By emphasizing the specific challenges and opportunities inherent in the Energy Transition, any Ecosystem initiative becomes more tailored and compelling by the time invested by the stakeholders, the commitment to being open and ready to exchange knowledge. We need to think about the business case the barriers and issues to overcome, and the broader points of any blueprint of how this evolves, influences and shapes

As one of its objectives, it must showcase how a collaborative ecosystem approach is beneficial and essential for overcoming the unique hurdles posed by the transition to a sustainable energy future and how it “learns”, that collective learning, so as to enable it to work.

In summary, a business ecosystem approach is about sharing resources and creating a collective intelligence that propels the entire Energy industry or sub-sector forward. The energy transition is a shared challenge, and by adopting a collaborative mindset, organizations can amplify their impact, increase resilience, and drive meaningful change.

The post Considering the design of the Energy Ecosystem first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

How do we accelerate the Energy transition? What contribution does fresh innovation provide? If we do not learn to share and collaborate more, we will fail. Simply put, the Energy solutions will not scale or resolve the changes and complexities we have in designing a new Energy Structure with radically different designs and capabilities.

I have been revamping my www.innovating4energy.com offering in a more focused way. So besides “latest posts” I raise relevant issues and offer solutions to help traverse differences and individual company needs by suggesting a more open, ecosystem thinking and design in different structured ways to assist in the energy transformation we urgently need.

I have broken down how I approach Energy through the application of innovation and its front end, the place of discovery, imagination and exploration:

* Energy Transforming
* Value Proposal
* Innovating Pillars
* Research and Deploy
* Reform and Disrupt
* Impact Steps
* Service Approach
* Connecting Up

There are so many focal points of necessary change within the Energy Transition, but I see my positioning as follows in supporting those undertaking the changes needed:

It is the ability to see beyond the existing and look more towards the preferred, applying different approaches that are possible when you engage in more open innovation thinking and more purposeful collaborations and co-creations that offers a real difference in the Energy Transition

It is seeking other opinions and thinking that can accelerate the changes we all need.

The post We need fresh perspectives in our thinking towards the Energy Transition. first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

Questioning the need to change how we approach the Energy transition.

I always determine the end of a year to be a highly reflective one to build out the future rationale, passion, and beliefs in what I do within the Energy transition. You evaluate what you have achieved, missed out on, and built upon all the new understandings and knowledge that constantly “flow” your way.

What really triggered me to go even deeper this year was the outcomes of the CoP28. I wrote a piece “dealing with the raw emotions of the CoP28 event“- it really did “push my buttons”. So much advice and pursuit of making the Energy transition changes seem to be tackled from narrow perspectives, and for me, this needs a very radical rethink and designed approach.

We do seem to be missing out on broader community engagement for this energy transition– I want to change that.

I don’t think we are making it the collaborative endeavour it needs to be. I wrote my final energy post for 2023 asking, “Can we change accepted practices in any energy transition?“

I opened that post by posing a question and pointing towards this answer.

“During this year, I felt we were in a growing need to significantly alter the accepted practices of managing the Energy Transition in a new, more innovative, ecosystem-thinking way. Why? We need to engage more broadly in community approaches related to energy. We need a broader energy transition movement.”

“The goal is to create a more dynamic, interconnected, and adaptable strategy that builds on having a more collaborative mindset on how we approach the transition to shifting energy sources and finding more creative solutions. We must infuse and interact with the community’s thinking to accelerate the energy transition to gain identification, adoption, and change.”

I have been focusing innovating4energy.com on being more at the front end of the Energy Transition we are all undergoing. I combine my thoughts with my business offerings, shown in separate tags at the top of this page.

I went through a revamp in the past weeks to anchor my approaches a little more. This post outlines this and equally encourages you to view each tab explaining this to see if I can help YOU.

Our integrated positioning statement

Innovating4Energy is a unique and invaluable knowledge provider dedicated to aiding organizations in transforming their energy ecosystems for sustainability, efficiency and forward-thinking.

Innovating4Energy is the catalyst for a sustainable and efficient energy future for its clients. Through a systematic, innovative, and flexible approach, we empower organizations to transform their energy ecosystems. Our unique value lies in driving collaboration, fostering innovation, and offering a roadmap reflecting options and pathways for showing the value of building energy solutions in innovating ecosystem ways.

Our unique value lies in fostering collaboration, driving innovation, and empowering organizations to shape a brighter, more sustainable energy ecosystem. Together, we pave the way for a future where energy transformation is necessary and presents remarkable opportunities for a sustainable future.

Our innovative and collaborative approach is anchored in bringing together the Key Pillars of Innovation and Ingenuity, the Research and Deploy methodology, and Reforming and Disruption strategies, which aims to propel organizations towards meaningful change in the dynamic energy sector and provide the delivery of impact and sustaining growth potential in a combined value proposal.

Approaching the energy transition in a different, more holistic way

As a knowledge provider at the forefront of energy, Innovating4Energy’s approach to the transition of changing to renewable energy is by firstly recognising it needs a really holistic approach in rationale and belief :

Recognizing the urgency of the challenge: The need to transition to renewable energy is more pressing than ever, given the accelerating pace of climate change, the growing environmental and social costs of fossil fuels, and many projects that do not offer a clear pathway to scale.

Harnessing the power of innovation ecosystems: Innovating4Energy should play a pivotal role in fostering collaboration among startups, research institutions, and industry partners to accelerate the development and deployment of renewable energy technologies in structuring ecosystem thinking and orchestrating the designs.

This offering can be achieved by:

• Fostering open innovation: Promoting the free flow of ideas, knowledge, and resources across the innovation ecosystem to ensure that the best ideas are shared and adopted.

• Encourage the Investing in early-stage technologies: Recognizing that early-stage technologies often hold the key to transformative solutions, Innovating4Energy should assist in identifying and building out business cases for clients to invest in supporting and nurturing these innovations.

• Providing credible and actionable insights: Innovating4Energy should leverage its expertise and insights to inform market participants about the latest renewable energy technologies, market trends, and regulatory developments. This can be done through:

• Publishing research reports and whitepapers: Sharing in-depth analysis of key issues and challenges the renewable energy sector faces to trigger new thinking and opportunity approaches by all engaged in the energy transition.

• Hosting or supporting webinars and events: Providing different options and insights into the platforms for industry experts to share their knowledge and discuss emerging trends.

• Developing data-driven tools and resources: Creating tools and resources that help market participants assess renewable energy projects’ feasibility and potential impact.

• Promoting responsible innovation: Innovating4Energy should emphasize the importance of responsible innovation practices to ensure that renewable energy technologies are developed and deployed to minimise their social and environmental impacts.

This can be achieved by enhancing work:

• Integrating social impact assessment into project evaluation: Assessing the potential social and environmental impacts of renewable energy projects early in development.

• Engaging with communities: Working collaboratively with affected communities to ensure that their concerns and interests are considered and integrated into any solutions in the future.

• Promoting transparency and accountability: Providing clear and transparent information about developing and deploying renewable energy technologies.

Our rationale is moving towards being a catalyst for Energy Transitions.

By taking these steps and revamping this Innovating4Energy website, I am hopeful we can be recognized and valued as contributors to playing a growing and valuable role in accelerating the transition to moving at an enhanced speed towards providing a future based more on renewable energy and shaping a more sustainable future for the energy sector, in broader engagements and the recognition that the front end of any conversations or work needs a more innovative holistic and integrated approach that ecosystem thinking and designs can provide.

We aim to offer a customised, highly collaborative and sustainability that sets us apart for compelling business propositions for organizations and their teams to lead from the front in the dynamically changing energy landscape.

The post Rationale, Passion and Beliefs: Changing how we approach the Energy transition. first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

During this year, I felt we were in a growing need to significantly alter the accepted practices of managing the Energy Transition in a new, more innovative, ecosystem-thinking way. Why? We need to engage more broadly in community approaches related to energy. We need a broader energy transition movement.

The goal is to create a more dynamic, interconnected, and adaptable strategy that builds on having a more collaborative mindset on how we approach the transition to shifting energy sources and finding more creative solutions. We must infuse and interact with the community’s thinking to accelerate the energy transition to gain identification, adoption, and change.

So, let’s think of a more “Innovative Ecosystem-Centric Energy Transition Approach”.

Earlier this year, I did a mini-series of three posts around a suggested valuing and perceiving energy in the community, envisioning energy as a living, evolving community.

For any successful energy transition, community engagement needs to be more front and centre in our Energy Transition thinking going forward.

How can we engage with communities earlier in any energy change? What approaches can make up thinking to shift existing mindsets? Do you agree we need a change to accelerate the Energy Transition?

By brain-storming, how about repositioning energy in communities and consumers’ minds to encourage them to embrace a change in their energy consumption and habits?

A radical agenda to shift our existing thinking needs a different set of perspectives, community-driven:

1. Narrative Shifting: Move away from framing the energy transition so often as solely a technical challenge. Develop a narrative that emphasizes the energy transition as a community-wide effort with positive impacts on quality of life, job creation, and local economies.
2. Community Energy Visioning: Build out far more community energy visioning sessions that engage residents, businesses, and local leaders. Encourage them to imagine their ideal energy future, considering not just energy sources but also economic, social, and cultural aspirations.
3. Ecosystem Co-Creation Camps: Organize immersive camps that bring together innovators, technologists, artists, policymakers, and local residents. Facilitate collaborative sessions to ideate cross-disciplinary projects that blend technology, art, and culture with sustainable energy solutions.
4. Open Energy Data Commons: Establish an open data platform aggregating energy consumption, production, and environmental data. This platform can be a foundation for innovators to build data-driven solutions and enable informed decision-making.
5. Energy Transition Hackathons: Host hackathons that challenge participants to create innovative solutions to energy-related challenges. Encourage participants from diverse backgrounds to collaborate on solutions that address energy access, equity, and local needs.
6. Art-Science Installations: Fuse art and science by commissioning interactive installations that visualize energy data in public spaces. These installations can engage the community, sparking conversations about energy consumption and encouraging sustainable behaviours.
7. Energy Entrepreneurship Labs: Collaborate with local universities and incubators to establish energy entrepreneurship labs. Provide resources and mentorship to students and startups working on groundbreaking energy solutions. Engage communities by drawing them into these ground-breaking solutions to alter perspectives and become part of the exploration.
8. Regenerative Energy Landscaping: Redefine urban planning by integrating renewable energy infrastructure with public spaces. Design concepts like solar benches, kinetic energy walkways, and vertical gardens that generate energy while enhancing urban aesthetics open up engagement.
9. Local Energy Tokens: Introduce a localized digital currency that rewards individuals and businesses for adopting sustainable energy practices. These tokens can be exchanged for goods, services, or further investments in the community’s energy initiatives.
10. Energy Transition Fellowships: Launch fellowship programs that place talented individuals within local communities to act as energy transition catalysts. These fellows can facilitate community engagement, partnerships, and education.
11. Transdisciplinary Innovation Sprints: Organize short-term innovation sprints that bring together experts from diverse fields to tackle specific energy challenges. Collaborative problem-solving can lead to unexpected breakthroughs.
12. Dynamic Policy Labs: Establish agile policy labs that include policymakers, community representatives, and experts. Co-create policies that incentivize energy innovation that address barriers and foster adaptive governance.

We need to change our thinking on the Energy Transition, a radical shift from the engineering top-down mindset to a community-driven one.

We can deploy a really radical approach by applying established business approaches.

We can build any community engagement over a process that includes 1) dynamic stakeholder mapping, 2) offering co-creation workshops, 3) seeking out emergent project ideation, 4) building adaptive collaboration networks, 5) encouraging rapid prototyping, 6) providing feedback-driven refinement, 7) leveraging ecosystem synergy for growing impact 8) gaining adaptive strategies 9) and networked learning and sharing to 10) capture, reflect and iterate.

The power of engagement

By integrating ecosystem thinking and design principles, you’re encouraging innovation and embracing the dynamic, interconnected nature of the community and its knowledge of the energy landscape. This approach allows for the emergence of creative and unique solutions that stem from the community’s collective knowledge, aspirations, and interactions and feed back into the “creators” of future energy solutions.

By embracing this innovative ecosystem-centric approach, the energy transition becomes a collaborative endeavour that considers the technical aspects of energy production and consumption alongside the essential cultural, economic, and social dimensions of the community so often missing from a more “top-down” approach. This list of suggestions can foster a sense of ownership and actively empower local communities to shape their energy future.

Applying ecosystem thinking to local energy innovation to seek out a more curiosity-driven exploration by engaging in conversations with diverse community members can allow and encourage a more significant opening up of our collective thinking to embrace change and bring their ideas into future energy solutions.

The post Can we change accepted practices in any Energy transition? first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

We are about to have the CoP28 event in the UAE from 30 November 2023 to 12 December 2023, which is crucial for the energy transition. I feel this is an actual watershed event. Those representatives attending must push for substantial agreements on what needs to be done to reduce carbonization and other polluting gases, seek ways to provide clean air and a more equitable share and conserve resources, or we will forever say goodbye to achieving anything like the 1.5 C degree.

Many experts predict that our planet is presently heading for warming to 3C. If we continue this trajectory, we will enter many unknowns in how the planet reacts and responds. If we have climate extremes, the cost of human life, upheaval and damage will continue to confront us.

This is why I think the energy transition is one of the most essential areas of necessary focus, as it is one of the most complex changes from fossil-burning fuels to clean renewables powered by solar, wind and hydro.

Here, I want to provide a view summarising the Energy Ecosystem, offering some strategic steps of underlying approaches to change and where I attempt to fit into contributions supporting solutions.

Changing the Energy Ecosystem:

Changing the energy ecosystem refers to a comprehensive and strategic effort to fundamentally transform how energy is generated, distributed, utilized, and managed within a region or globally. This transformation involves a departure from traditional, often fossil-fuel-based energy systems towards more sustainable, efficient, and environmentally responsible alternatives. It encompasses various facets of the energy sector, including:

1. Energy Sources: Shifting from carbon-intensive energy sources (such as coal and oil) to cleaner and renewable sources (such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal).
2. Energy Efficiency: Enhancing the efficiency of energy production, transmission, and consumption to reduce waste and minimize environmental impact.
3. Infrastructure: Upgrading and modernizing energy infrastructure to accommodate new technologies, grid enhancements, and decentralized energy generation.
4. Policy and Regulation: Implementing supportive policies, regulations, and incentives to encourage sustainable energy practices and discourage harmful ones.
5. Innovation: Embracing innovation and technological advancements to create more sustainable, cost-effective, and reliable energy solutions.

Why Changing the Energy Ecosystem Is Important:

1. Environmental Sustainability: The current energy ecosystem heavily relies on fossil fuels, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Changing the ecosystem is vital to mitigate environmental damage, reduce pollution, and limit global warming.
2. Resource Conservation: Transitioning to renewable energy sources helps conserve finite fossil fuel resources and reduce dependence on geopolitically unstable regions for energy supplies.
3. Energy Security: A diversified and decentralized energy ecosystem enhances energy security, reducing vulnerability to supply disruptions and geopolitical tensions.
4. Economic Opportunities: The energy transition offers substantial economic opportunities, from the growth of clean energy industries to job creation in renewable energy and technology sectors.
5. Health Benefits: Cleaner energy sources improve air quality and reduce pollution-related health issues, benefiting public health.
6. Technological Advancements: Innovation in energy technologies can lead to breakthroughs with broader applications, driving progress in various sectors of the economy.
7. Global Responsibility: As a global issue, addressing the energy ecosystem is a matter of international responsibility. It involves nations cooperating to combat climate change and reduce their carbon footprints.

Changing the Energy Ecosystem by building an approach to change that builds innovation and ingenuity through experimentation and pilots, looking for leapfrog opportunities through rapid learning and knowledge sharing.

A strategic approach to transforming the energy ecosystem. Let’s break this down by focal points, step by step:

1. Changing the Energy Ecosystem: This signifies the overarching goal of making significant and positive changes to how energy is produced, distributed, and consumed. It often implies a shift towards cleaner, more sustainable, and more efficient energy sources and practices.
2. Building Out an Approach: This suggests developing a structured and systematic plan or strategy to transform the energy ecosystem. This approach should be well-thought-out and comprehensive and provide clear roadmaps for the essential broad inclusion solutions required.
3. Change Through Innovation and Ingenuity: To bring about meaningful change, the approach emphasizes the importance of creativity, originality, and novel solutions. This implies that following established practices may not be sufficient, and new ideas and inventions are necessary.
4. Experimentation and Pilots: This highlights the need to try out new technologies, processes, or concepts on a smaller scale before implementing them on a larger, more significant scale. Pilots and experiments allow for learning from mistakes and refining strategies.
5. Leapfrog Opportunities: This indicates the desire to skip over intermediate stages of development and adopt more advanced, efficient, or sustainable technologies or practices. Leapfrogging often involves embracing cutting-edge solutions instead of gradually evolving existing systems.
6. Rapid Learning: In this context, rapid learning means quickly acquiring knowledge and insights from experimentation and experiences. It’s about being agile and adaptable in response to new information and challenges.
7. Knowledge Sharing: To accelerate progress, the approach involves sharing the knowledge and insights gained with relevant stakeholders, such as organizations, governments, and the public. This helps spread best practices and avoid duplicative efforts.

To achieve a sustainable energy transition, there must be consistency in advocating for a systematic, innovative, and flexible approach to transforming the energy ecosystem. Its central emphasis is the importance of learning from experimentation, seeking advanced solutions, and sharing knowledge to make rapid progress towards a more sustainable and efficient energy future in highly collaborative and open ways.

In summary, we must recognize that changing the energy ecosystem is essential to address pressing environmental, economic, and societal challenges. It is not merely about upgrading energy infrastructure but fundamentally shifting our approach to renewables in energy production and consumption to create a more sustainable and resilient future for all. This understanding underscores the endeavour’s importance in the broader context of sustainability and global well-being, enabling the planet to stabilize and slowly recover.

Building out our Value Proposition:

“To focus and support wherever we can, the revolutionizing of the energy landscape, through supporting concept knowledge, insights and ideas to inform and support, to deliver cutting-edge innovation and unwavering ingenuity- both are needed in abundance. The work undertaken needs to build and deliver sustainable, efficient, and forward-thinking solutions that empower individuals, organizations, and communities to thrive in a cleaner, smarter energy future”.

Key Pillars of the Value Proposition:

1. Innovative Solutions: We search and encourage pioneering groundbreaking technologies, strategies, and practices that redefine the energy sector to trigger new thinking or build out existing understanding, hopefully in new, novel ways. Our focal point is the pursuit of innovation that pushes creation and discovery to create solutions that transcend existing boundaries or limits. We look to support those wishing to operate at the forefront of change and push the known edges.
2. Ingenuity in Action: We look towards challenges and view obstacles as opportunities. The search for understanding combines creativity, expertise, and a passion for problem-solving to craft unique and effective knowledge solutions tailored to the evolving needs of the energy ecosystem that trigger and support the advancement of others, better equipped to find breakthroughs in their business.
3. Sustainability at the Core: Critically, the work undertaken must support sustainable energy practices that reduce environmental impact, promote responsible resource management, and protect the planet for future generations.
4. Customized Approaches: We understand that every energy challenge is unique in context and content. Our approach needs to be highly adaptable and customizable, allowing us to address our partners’ and clients’ specific needs and goals, whether they are businesses, governments, or communities. The narrative and how it is built are vitally important to each piece of work.
5. Continuous Learning: We believe that innovation thrives on knowledge. We foster a culture of constant learning, regularly integrating new insights and technologies into our insights, knowledge and solution work to ensure that our clients benefit from the latest advancements. Learning is highly reciprocal and scalable; it is all about liberating creative energy and achieving higher engagement.
6. Collaboration: We know that transformation requires a united effort. We actively collaborate with searching for the latest insights and knowledge, connecting with industry leaders, research institutions, and local communities to co-create solutions that deliver sustainable impact.
7. Judgement-based results: Innovation collaboration can be judged based on its contribution, impact, scalability, sustainability, growth potential and the creation of mutual benefit and value for all parties involved.

Our positioning is anchored in the belief that together, we can create a future where energy transformation is necessary and offers us all a remarkable opportunity for a more sustaining future.

By focusing on innovation, collaboration, and seeking clear resolutions, we pave the way for a sustainable and prosperous energy ecosystem that benefits you. We are your partners in progress to achieve your vision and market fit for contributing to a cleaner, more efficient, and sustainable energy future based on renewables by taking our “Innovating Pillars” approach and working through the “Impact Steps“.

We adopt a “Research and Deploy” approach, providing a structured framework for acquiring knowledge, generating insights, and deploying innovations effectively in your energy transition strategy. We believe the outside view or opinion is essential when embarking on a “Reforming and Disruption” within the changes undertaken within the Energy System.

We advocate for a systematic, innovative, and flexible approach to transforming the energy ecosystem.

The post Why I think the energy transition as one of the most important areas of necessary focus first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

Recently released is the First Global Stocktake for the forthcoming CoP28

This summary of the progress made from the CoP23 Paris Agreement is the first official global stock take undertaken, known as the

Technical dialogue of the first global stocktake

The report will be a central debating feature of the CoP28 meeting, to be held between November 30^th to December 12^th, 2023, in Dubai, the UAE. This report aims to inform and gain consensus on how to move forward.

Over 70,000 attendees are expected to gather and discuss various issues relating to our climate and formulate a fresh impetus for the path forward.

So, in Summary, this global stock take undertaken had these conclusions

Context

1. Since its adoption, the Paris Agreement has driven near-universal climate action by setting goals and sending signals to the world regarding the urgency of responding to the climate crisis. While action is proceeding, much more is needed now on all fronts.
2. To strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate poverty, governments need to support systems transformations that mainstream climate resilience and low GHG emissions development. Credible, accountable and transparent actions by non-party stakeholders are needed to strengthen efforts for systems transformations.
3. Systems transformations open up many opportunities, but rapid change can be disruptive. Focusing on inclusion and equity can increase ambition in climate action and support.

Mitigation, including response measures

1. Global emissions are not in line with modelled global mitigation pathways consistent with the temperature goal of the Paris Agreement, and there is a rapidly narrowing window to raise ambition and implement existing commitments in order tolimit warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels.
2. Much more ambition in action and support is needed in implementing domestic mitigation measures and setting more ambitious targets in NDCs to realize existing and emerging opportunities across contexts, in order toreduce global GHG emissions by 43 per cent by 2030 and further by 60 per cent by 2035 compared with 2019 levels and reach net zero CO2 emissions by 2050 globally.
3. Achieving net zero CO2 and GHG emissions requires systems transformations across all sectors and contexts, including scaling up renewable energy while phasing out all unabated fossil fuels, ending deforestation, reducing non-CO2 emissions, and implementing supply-and demand-side measures.
4. Just transitions can support more robust and equitable mitigation outcomes with tailored approaches addressing different contexts.
5. Economic diversification is a key strategy to address the impacts of response measures, with various options that can be applied in different contexts.

Adaptation, including loss and damage

1. As climate change threatens all countries, communities and people around the world, increased adaptation action as well as enhanced efforts to avert, minimize and address loss and damage are urgently needed to reduce and respond to increasing impacts, particularly for those who are least prepared for change and least able to recover from disasters.
2. Collectively, there is increasing ambition in plans and commitments for adaptation action and support, but most observed adaptation efforts are fragmented, incremental, sector-specific and unequally distributed across regions.
3. When adaptation is informed and driven by local contexts, populations and priorities, both the adequacy and the effectiveness of adaptation action and support are enhanced, and this can also promote transformational adaptation.
4. Averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage requires urgent action across climate and development policies to manage risks comprehensively and provide support to impacted communities.
5. Support for adaptation and funding arrangements for averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage need to be rapidly scaled up from expanded and innovative sources, and financial flows need to be made consistent with climate-resilient development to meet urgent and increasing needs.

Means of implementation and support and finance flows

1. Scaled-up mobilization of support for climate action in developing countries entails strategically deploying international public finance, which remains a prime enabler for action, and continuing to enhance effectiveness, including access, ownership and impacts.
2. Making financial flows -international and domestic, public and private-consistent with a pathway toward low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development entails creating opportunities to unlock trillions of dollars and shift investments to climate action across scales.
3. Existing cleaner technologies need to be rapidly deployed, together with accelerated innovation, development and transfer of new technologies, to support the needs of developing countries.
4. Capacity-building is foundational to achieving broad-ranging and sustained climate action and requires effective country-led and needs-based cooperation to ensure capacities are enhanced and retained over time at all levels.

The Thematics over the two weeks of CoP 28 are shown below.

Conclusion (no rocket science here)

Now is the time to rapidly accelerate action and support to make progress in this critical decade.

The post First Global Stocktake for the forthcoming CoP28 first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

For me, the Energy Transition is a complex, multi-headed beast that always provides more challenge rather than less.

We seem to be faced with Hydra. The Hydra was Hercules’s second labour. He attempted to cut off the heads of the beast, but every time one was cut off, two more would grow back in its place. Another challenge in killing the Hydra was that its’ breath was poisonous to all who crossed its path.

The weakness of the Hydra was that only one of its heads was immortal. In the energy transition world, I worry that this one immortal head might be fossil fuel, challenging to slay.

I don’t slay beasts; I try to shape the behaviours of clients. Renewables feature front and centre. Getting engagement is hard work; adopting different thinking and application solutions is even more challenging. The level of engagement determines the ability to allow a different way to permeate and take hold. You need many tools, ideas, visuals, promoters, discussions, etc.

Finding the time for clients to get into these types of immersion is not easy; it has to be really “mixed” up. Do I have this “cocktail” right? Frankly, no, but tackling. Individuals or teams need to find their reactive points. They need to want to open up to change. I love the word “catalyst.” if it gains the type of reaction you are looking for, you are the agent that provokes or speeds action or change.

I take and leverage the use of Ecosystem thinking and design for promoting innovation within the Energy Transition?” My constant question is how do we adequately apply Ecosystem thinking and design, innovation engagement and activation to gain attention and achieve attraction and participation in the Energy Transition? How do we reduce greenhouse gases and seek out clean energy solutions? What does that mean, and what contributions can be made? That is a good starting point to kick-start new thinking.

When I delve into the application of ecosystem thinking and design, innovation engagement, and activation strategies to promote innovation within the energy transition, I try to bring the different elements and strive to integrate them effectively. To do that, you need a veritable tool kit.

Let me summarize many of the moving parts here.

Ecosystem Thinking and Design: We began by emphasizing the importance of understanding the ecosystem’s interconnected elements, stakeholders, and dynamics in the Energy issues trying to be resolved. This understanding forms the foundation for designing innovative approaches that consider the broader context, gather the research, relate to the challenges and complexities and, through levels of fostering collaboration, try to enable holistic solutions.

Innovation Engagement and Activation: I then apply ecosystem-centric innovation engagement strategies to ensure active participation and attraction within the energy transition. These are selective and constrained by the challenge, time, resources and investment.

The aim is to raise up interest and engagement by applying selectively to draw out and gain insights and fill the gaps. How far I can go always boils down to “it depends.” In how much time, what commitment and ability to spend time on reacting differently. Managing energy transitions is like coaching, mentoring and advising to change perceptions, habits and entrenched positions. You have to draw these out.

My shortened group to keep referring back to.

1. Curiosity-Driven Exploration: Initiate conversations and engage diverse stakeholders to uncover unique perspectives and insights.
2. Dynamic Stakeholder Mapping: This allows stakeholders to emerge organically through engagement, ensuring a comprehensive network of participants.
3. Co-Creation Workshops: Collaboratively ideate solutions that align with community values and diverse expertise.
4. Emergent Project Ideation: Encourage organic project ideas to emerge during co-creation sessions, allowing innovation to flow naturally.
5. Adaptive Collaboration Networks: Create flexible networks that adapt to project needs, ensuring diverse contributions.
6. Rapid Prototyping: Prototype multiple ideas quickly to test feasibility and gather real-time feedback.
7. Feedback-Driven Refinement: Integrate feedback from both participants and the wider community to iterate and refine projects.
8. Ecosystem Synergy: Identify opportunities to collaborate with existing initiatives, maximizing impact through shared efforts.
9. Adaptive Strategies: Stay agile, adjusting strategies based on real-time feedback and emerging opportunities.
10. Networked Learning: Foster continuous learning and knowledge sharing within the community for ongoing improvement.
11. Distributed Leadership: Empower community members to lead various aspects of the energy innovation ecosystem, promoting diverse contributions.
12. Reflect and Iterate: Regularly assess the approach’s effectiveness, refine strategies, and continuously enhance the ecosystem-centric innovation efforts.

Attracting Attention and Participation: A large part of my job is to push the boundaries of conventional approaches, suggesting disruptive and out-of-the-box concepts that engage participants, capture attention, and drive participation. Without a doubt, attention-grabbing approaches are hard as so many can become quickly overwhelmed by the sheer complexity and multiple challenges that the Energy Transition presents.

Achieving levels of captivation, exploring present norms and seeing how and what can replace them, fostering a collaborative environment, making it innovative and putting in place a path for sustainable progress is not a bad place to end up as Energy has got so much legacy, established opinions and acceptance of “well that’s the way we do it” it is tough to make innovation more central in a team or persons mind.

Still, I try to emphasise the importance of understanding the ecosystem’s interconnected elements, stakeholders and dynamics. This understanding forms the foundation for the understanding and designing of innovative approaches that deliberately consider the broader context, looking to foster collaborations to enable more expansive- thinking and consider different solutions to the existing norm.

The post Seeing a different Energy Future away from Fossil Fuel first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.

I have to admit that I am sceptical of individual energy organizations’ pledges to move toward a carbon-neutral future. They argue that there is a limited amount of time to make this transition, yet it is broadly recognized that individual organizations cannot achieve this alone. Are energy organizations open enough to alternative suggestions for overcoming the resource and knowledge constraints working alone can bring? Are they exploring alternative thinking enough, such as organised collective challenges? We need to bridge the gap through collaborations at multiple firm levels.

I believe there is a weakness in the energy ecosystem that deprives it of more significant collective action and innovation to achieve a more accelerated pathway to the energy transition. My argument is that while many energy companies are working on solutions within the energy transition, they often work in isolation and struggle to get out of their “self-made” islands of knowledge.

I suggest that applying ecosystem thinking and platform solutions could bring together many organizations to work in broader, more ambitious innovation ecosystems of collaborations or even work through grand challenge-designed approaches.

When you consider that is a lot of cross-over, duplication of efforts on how the companies design, develop, and deliver new concepts as they stay within their own walls and R&D expertise,

Why can’t they throw open common challenges in finding solutions through contests, research investigations, accelerator programs, and open innovation platforms, looking for commonality and synergies?

Often the reluctance, besides the risk of giving something up, opening up to less internal work you need to explore the mechanisms for collaboration, we begin to think of ecosystem collaborations. The use of a common platform could provide helpful, knowledgeable, and higher levels of neutrality and overcome often needless arguments about who takes the lead and is the orchestrator. In Energy, the solution resolution to reduce current challenges in costs, fuel alternatives, and reducing the carbon footprint all need urgent addressing.

Besides finding the appropriate platform, however, I equally acknowledge that there are natural boundaries that any collaboration must overcome, such as competing priorities, intellectual property rights, organizational structures and cultures, regulatory and legal barriers, communication and coordination issues, and funding and resources. I wrote a series around cross-collaboration recently, here is the link to the first post.

All obstacles can be overcome and are “doable”. If you believe in the “need” to succeed at the energy transition as quickly as we can, then you have to be willing to open up your thinking to far greater collaborations. Complexities and challenges need collectively breaking down to find new solutions.

I also suggest that the opportunities lie in a number of “higher level” needs of common understanding and focus that are essential to transformation. These include Smart Grid development, Energy Storage, Grid Modernization and automation, and Electricity of transport. Cybersecurity and Data collaborations

Good cross- collaborations examples are where competition is transcended by energy solution needs that have common standards, potential and urgent need to scale, and can be offered in other geographical areas that need creative and modern solutions.

Also, we need to learn to be more effective in our collaborative approaches with multiple stakeholders, and policy regulators that having this level of greater collaboration would command serious attention and respect and lead, in many cases to industry solutions in more economical ways that over time speed up the Energy Transition.

The post How can we encourage more Collaborative Solutions in the Energy Transition? first appeared on Innovating the Energy Transition.